I have no idea where to begin in response to this
“Affirmative Action” article. When
reading it I found myself responding to him in such a way that was angry,
irritated and astonished that a person that is technically one of my peers
could be so ignorant to the real issue at hand. He contradicts himself in so many different
areas, that I almost have to consider this as an early Aprils fool’s joke.
My
first thought on this issue of Affirmative Action at the University of Texas
is…What Affirmative action? Seriously… With only 12% blacks making up the Texas
population, I find it very interesting to believe that affirmative action is
really benefiting any black individual getting into U.T., especially when we
(blacks) aren’t even making up 5% of the university. I guess since Mr. McGarvey was so busy
voicing his frustrations that he forgot to account for the other 95% that is
being “plagued” by affirmative action.
I truly
believe that he does not fully understand the purpose of Affirmative
Action. As an African American student
accepted into the University of Texas, I do find this entire article to be
offensive and degrading. One thing he
not aware of is that a very large majority, if not all of it due to the transfer
or the athlete students, are in this institution for the mere fact that we
graduated at the top 10% of our class and in recent cases top 8%. So in reality, that 4% of students that he is
putting into that circle of “reverse racism” is less than half of the U.T black
population because as we all are aware, athletes must only have a 2.5 gpa and
make a 1200 on the SAT to be accepted on a full scholarship. This is the rule for black and white athletes
before somebody tries to imply that affirmative action is dictating the
athletes that make up our schools as well.
He tries
to make the point about using socioeconomic equality as a method to determine
who is accepted and receives scholarships.
This point would be great if he wasn’t trying to use it in a way to put
down blacks. If he really knew what he
was talking about, he would only understand that using socioeconomic equality
would only increase the amount of minority students at U.T. Race definitely is a criterion in this factor
because as we know African Americans make up the most percent of families with
low income. When he states, “ For example, who needs a
scholarship more: a black child from a family of doctors and lawyers or a white
child living in a slum with a single parent working as a janitor? Financial
data does a much better job of predicting financial need than does the color of
one’s skin.” Chances are that a student
that comes from a successful family will be in the top 10% of their class or
attending a more prominent institution like Yale, Harvard or Emory. I think universally we can agree that there
are far much less black students with a background like that compared to white
counterparts.
Clearly
Affirmative action is only a problem to
those who aren’t black because they aren’t included. The norm of this country reflects the ideals
of primarily one group (whites). That
one group has remained in power for centuries and anything that does not
involve and benefit them as well is viewed as unacceptable in terms of societies
needs. Until the norm reflects more than
just one cultural standard, affirmative action is needed and is not harming any
other race while in use.